Trump Makes Letitia James And Judge Engoron Cry
This is a MAJOR win for Trump!
In a recent legal development, a New York Appeals Court has modified the bond payment required of former President Trump, reducing it significantly. Originally facing a deadline to pay a hefty $454 million bond due to civil fraud allegations from New York Attorney General Letitia James, Trump saw a dramatic shift in his financial obligation.
The Appeals Court intervened just hours before the deadline, revising the bond amount to $175 million, which Trump must now pay within the next ten days. Trump has indicated his compliance with this decision, stating his intention to fulfill the revised bond requirement promptly.
This adjustment carries significant implications, as meeting the new bond threshold would effectively thwart attempts by Attorney General James to seize Trump’s assets while he continues to contest the judgment rendered by New York Judge Arthur Engoron.
Trump expressed his dissatisfaction with Judge Engoron’s handling of the case, particularly highlighting what he perceives as a refusal to adhere to the Appellate Division’s directives regarding the Statute of Limitations. Through social media, Trump criticized Engoron’s decisions and called for the lifting of the GAG ORDER imposed during proceedings.
This latest ruling marks the fifth time Trump claims to have been overturned in this legal saga, further diminishing the credibility of Judge Engoron and Attorney General James. Trump’s legal team echoed his sentiments, heralding the Appeals Court’s decision as a pivotal step toward overturning what they describe as a baseless judgment driven by political motives.
Meanwhile, Attorney General James remains resolute, emphasizing that Trump still faces accountability for alleged fraudulent activities. Despite the reduced bond, the judgment against Trump and his co-defendants remains intact, signaling ongoing legal battles on the horizon.
Throughout the trial and subsequent appeals, Trump has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, insisting that his financial statements were accurately presented and that his assets were undervalued. His legal team has challenged the proceedings, criticizing the lack of a jury trial and accusing the court of political bias.
Despite the financial setback and legal hurdles, Trump remains steadfast, asserting his willingness to pursue legal recourse even up to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary. As the legal drama unfolds, the fate of Trump’s assets and the resolution of the case hang in the balance, with both sides digging in for a protracted legal battle.
