Biden Gets Worse News
The Department of Justice has been cleared to release audio recordings of former President Joe Biden’s interviews with his ghostwriter after two major court decisions removed the final legal barriers on Monday.
The long-awaited release is expected to draw renewed attention to the investigation into Biden’s handling of classified documents, an issue that has remained a point of debate in Washington for years. The recordings were gathered during Special Counsel Robert Hur’s investigation and are now being reviewed by lawmakers, journalists, and the public following multiple legal victories for those seeking greater government transparency.
Appeals Court Clears the Way for Public Release
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia dissolved a temporary injunction that had prevented the recordings from being released. The ruling came in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Mike Howell, president of the Oversight Project and former visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation.
Meanwhile, a second legal dispute was resolved when U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan threw out Biden’s lawsuit that attempted to prevent the Department of Justice from turning the recordings over to the House Judiciary Committee. The dismissal followed Biden’s decision to voluntarily abandon the case, ending that effort to block the release.
With both legal obstacles removed, the Justice Department can now move forward with releasing the recordings.
House Judiciary Committee Celebrates Access
Members of the House Judiciary Committee welcomed the court decisions, noting they had spent more than a year seeking access to the audio.
According to the committee, investigators first requested the recordings in 2024 and later recommended contempt proceedings against Biden’s ghostwriter, Mark Zwonitzer, after he allegedly failed to comply with a congressional subpoena requesting the material.
The committee also praised President Donald Trump and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, saying the Justice Department’s decision to release the recordings reflects a commitment to greater government transparency and congressional oversight.
Recordings Date Back to Biden’s Memoir
The recordings capture conversations between Biden and Zwonitzer during 2016 and 2017 while the two worked together on Biden’s memoir, Promise Me, Dad: A Year of Hope, Hardship, and Purpose.
Although originally recorded for the book project, the interviews later became key evidence during Special Counsel Robert Hur’s investigation into Biden’s retention of classified documents dating back to his years as a U.S. senator and vice president.
Investigators reviewed the conversations as they examined whether classified records had been improperly retained after Biden left public office.
Oversight Project Calls for More Accountability
Mike Howell argued that the recordings should never have remained out of public view.
He said Americans deserve full transparency regarding the investigation and questioned whether all aspects of the classified documents case received sufficient scrutiny. Howell also suggested that unresolved questions surrounding the investigation deserve additional review.
His comments reflect broader calls from some Republicans and government watchdog groups for increased accountability in cases involving classified information.
Nearly 70 Hours of Audio Become Public
According to multiple reports, roughly 70 hours of recordings have been shared with CBS News.
In addition, the House Judiciary Committee has publicly released nearly three hours of audio on social media, while the Oversight Project has published the recordings alongside a 117-page transcript to allow the public to review the material in greater detail.
The release gives Americans an opportunity to hear portions of the interviews rather than relying solely on written summaries from investigators.
Biden Discusses Sensitive Meetings
Several recordings reportedly capture Biden describing meetings involving national security matters.
Among the conversations released are references to meetings with the CIA, discussions held inside the White House Situation Room, and Department of Defense briefings involving the president.
The recordings also include discussions about personal notes Biden kept while serving in government.
During one October 2016 interview, Biden told Zwonitzer that he possessed extensive notes that he said White House officials did not know he had retained.
Classified Documents Become Part of Hur Investigation
Another recording from February 2017 received particular attention because Biden remarked that he had “just found all the classified stuff downstairs.”
Special Counsel Robert Hur referenced that statement in his final report while examining whether Biden retained classified documents after leaving office.
Hur described Biden’s tone as matter-of-fact and suggested he may have forgotten about the documents shortly after making the comment.
Other portions of the interviews show Biden taking a more cautious approach when discussing government matters. In one recording, he specifically limited his comments to the “non-classified” portion of a discussion with then-President Barack Obama.
Why Charges Were Never Filed
Hur’s investigation focused on whether Biden unlawfully retained or disclosed classified information.
His report outlined several examples involving sensitive government records, including an allegation that Biden showed his ghostwriter classified notes from a National Security Council meeting during the Obama administration.
Despite identifying evidence that classified material had been retained, Hur ultimately declined to recommend criminal charges.
The report concluded that prosecutors would likely face significant challenges obtaining a conviction. Among the factors cited was the expectation that a jury could view Biden as a sympathetic elderly man with memory issues, creating reasonable doubt about criminal intent.
That conclusion sparked sharp political debate, with supporters arguing the investigation followed the law and critics questioning whether different standards had been applied.
Renewed Debate Over Transparency
Now that the legal battles have concluded, the audio recordings are expected to receive renewed scrutiny from members of Congress, legal experts, and the American public.
Republicans have argued the recordings provide additional insight into the classified documents investigation and reinforce the need for government accountability. Democrats have maintained that the Justice Department thoroughly reviewed the matter and reached its legal conclusions based on the available evidence.
Regardless of political views, the court rulings mark a significant step in making previously restricted materials available to the public. As lawmakers continue reviewing the recordings, the debate surrounding classified documents, presidential records, and government transparency is likely to remain an important issue heading into future congressional oversight efforts.






