Ocasio-Cortez Lies About Jesus, Gets Humiliated

AOC got schooled!

In a thought-provoking critique penned for the Washington Post, Paula Fredriksen, a renowned biblical scholar and Aurelio Professor of Scripture emerita at Boston University, raised concerns over what she sees as the misappropriation of Jesus Christ for political agendas during Holy Week, particularly in the context of the Gaza conflict.

Fredriksen urged for a reconsideration of the portrayal of Jesus, cautioning against the characterization of him as a “Palestinian Jew,” a trend she observed gaining momentum among left-leaning politicians such as Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and media figures. She argued that such attempts to align Jesus with modern geopolitical narratives are not only historically inaccurate but also dangerously inflammatory.

The controversy was reignited during Christmas when various liberal voices, including Democratic members of the “Squad,” drew criticism for equating Jesus with a “Palestinian Jew” living in an “occupied” territory. Fredriksen criticized these interpretations as a distortion of historical reality, highlighting the discrepancy between the ancient land of Israel and the modern Palestinian territories.

One notable instance was Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s social media post on Christmas Day, where she depicted Jesus as a symbol of resistance against oppressive forces, drawing parallels between the biblical narrative and contemporary political struggles in the region. Fredriksen countered these claims by pointing out that Bethlehem, traditionally associated with Jesus’s birth, has been under Palestinian authority for decades, undermining the narrative of ongoing occupation.

Moreover, Fredriksen underscored the challenges faced by Christians in modern-day Gaza, emphasizing the hostile environment and the decline in the Christian population due to persecution. She argued that labeling Jesus as a Palestinian not only distorts historical facts but also perpetuates animosity towards Jews, echoing age-old accusations of Jewish responsibility for Jesus’s crucifixion.

Fredriksen emphasized the importance of historical accuracy and context in discussions surrounding Jesus’s identity and urged for a more nuanced understanding that respects both biblical narrative and modern geopolitical realities. She criticized the appropriation of Jesus for political purposes as a divisive tactic that undermines genuine dialogue and reconciliation.

Fredriksen’s critique extended beyond political figures to include Catholic priest Father Edward Beck, who made similar comparisons on CNN, drawing parallels between Jesus’s plight and contemporary refugee crises. While acknowledging the universal message of empathy and solidarity in the Christmas story, Fredriksen cautioned against oversimplifying complex historical narratives for political expediency.

In conclusion, Fredriksen’s analysis calls for a reevaluation of how Jesus is invoked in contemporary discourse, advocating for a more nuanced and historically informed approach that acknowledges the complexities of both biblical narrative and modern geopolitics.