Biden Refuses To Protect Trump
In recent discussions, national security expert Fred Fleitz has raised significant concerns about the Biden administration’s handling of Iran and its threats against former President Donald Trump. According to Fleitz, the administration has not only been aware of these threats but has also taken a stance that could be interpreted as appeasement towards the Iranian regime.
Fleitz pointed out that Iran has issued threats against Trump and his former officials throughout Biden’s time in office. Instead of taking decisive action, the administration has opted for negotiations and has failed to enforce crucial sanctions. This lack of assertiveness has, according to Fleitz, allowed Iran to bolster its power and confidence. He notes that the administration’s approach has resulted in Iran gaining nearly $100 billion in additional revenue, thanks in part to unregulated oil sales—much of which has been funneled to China.
Just last month, the situation escalated dramatically. A would-be assassin was arrested after attempting to carry out a threat against Trump, highlighting the serious nature of these risks. Fleitz expressed alarm that the Biden administration has not made a meaningful effort to ensure the safety of Trump or any former officials. He emphasized that this negligence has sent a dangerous message to Iran, suggesting that they can act on their threats without facing repercussions.
Fleitz’s remarks raise an important question: Should America’s foreign policy prioritize strength and deterrence, particularly with regimes that openly threaten our leaders? Many Republicans believe that a strong stance against adversaries like Iran is crucial for maintaining national security. The failure to address these threats seriously not only jeopardizes the safety of former officials but also undermines America’s global standing. As we approach future elections, it is vital to consider how we can restore a foreign policy that prioritizes American strength and security.