Democrats Hide Secret Intel From Trump
This has to be illegal.
Former CIA director John Brennan recently shared his insights on MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace show, expressing concerns about the intelligence community’s approach to briefing former President Trump should he secure the GOP presidential nomination. Brennan highlighted the possibility of withholding sensitive intelligence from Trump, citing apprehensions about his handling of classified information and ongoing legal issues.
Traditionally, sitting administrations provide intelligence briefings to presidential candidates, ensuring continuity and preparedness regardless of party affiliation. However, Brennan emphasized the unprecedented circumstances surrounding Trump’s situation, referencing his indictment for mishandling classified information and his perceived cavalier attitude toward national security matters.
In response to Wallace’s mention of a Politico article detailing intelligence officials’ reservations about briefing Trump, Brennan characterized the decision as fraught with risk, particularly given Trump’s legal challenges and past conduct regarding classified information.
Brennan acknowledged the tradition of providing briefings but hinted at a cautious approach by intelligence leaders, suggesting that sensitive information might be withheld to prevent potential misuse by Trump. Instead, he anticipated providing analytical overviews of global hotspots, devoid of sensitive details that could compromise sources and methods.
Drawing attention to Trump’s past criticisms of the intelligence community, Brennan speculated that the former president might disparage the briefings once received, continuing his pattern of undermining intelligence agencies.
Brennan’s remarks reflect longstanding concerns about Trump’s relationship with U.S. intelligence, echoing earlier assertions of potential compromise and foreign influence. Throughout Trump’s tenure, Brennan had been vocal about allegations of collusion with Russia, although subsequent investigations yielded no evidence to support such claims.
Additionally, Brennan was among a group of former intelligence officials who raised doubts about the authenticity of materials related to Hunter Biden during the 2020 election, suggesting they could be part of a Russian disinformation campaign.
Overall, Brennan’s commentary underscores the delicate balance between tradition and prudence in intelligence briefings, particularly in unprecedented circumstances involving a former president facing legal challenges and ongoing scrutiny over his handling of classified information.
