Bolton Trashes Trump’s DOGE

During a recent interview, former National Security Adviser John Bolton voiced concerns about the proposed cuts to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), warning that some of these reductions could jeopardize long-term American interests, especially in the realm of foreign policy. Bolton emphasized that foreign aid, when properly managed, plays a critical role in advancing U.S. interests abroad by fostering relationships with allies and persuading other nations to become friends. However, he clarified that the key to effective foreign aid is not simply about spending money, but about directing it strategically to the right countries to further American goals.

Bolton explained that while bureaucratic resistance to change is common, it’s crucial for leadership within government agencies to hold these systems accountable. He stressed the need for strong leadership that can push back against entrenched bureaucracies when necessary, instead of simply relying on administrative procedures that fail to achieve meaningful results. He specifically referenced the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which falls under DOGE’s scope, as a prime example of an agency needing reform. According to Bolton, while there are numerous issues within USAID, completely dismantling the organization would be a mistake.

The Trump administration has long criticized USAID, accusing it of promoting liberal agendas globally and misallocating resources. There were even discussions about folding it into the State Department, with figures like Secretary of State Marco Rubio taking on leadership roles. High-profile allies of Trump, such as Elon Musk, have also been vocal in condemning USAID, labeling it a criminal organization for its activities.

Bolton argued that foreign assistance, when directed carefully, is a crucial tool for national security. However, he warned that gutting these programs entirely would eliminate a significant tool for America’s influence on the global stage. He also recommended rethinking U.S. financial contributions to organizations like the United Nations and the World Bank, where the U.S. often does not receive the recognition it deserves for its contributions. Bolton suggested that Trump’s potential UN Ambassador, Elise Stefani, explore reducing U.S. donations to certain UN programs while evaluating which areas truly benefit the country’s national security.

The debate surrounding foreign aid and government efficiency is ongoing, and Bolton’s insights highlight the delicate balance between reform and preserving essential tools for America’s influence in international relations.