Historian Certain Kamala Will Win?
The idea of an “October surprise” in American politics often grabs headlines, but according to historian Allan Lichtman, it’s largely overstated. Lichtman, a professor at American University, has successfully predicted presidential election outcomes since 1984 using his unique “Keys to the White House” methodology, which consists of 13 true-or-false questions that gauge fundamental political dynamics rather than the noise of last-minute campaigning.
Lichtman emphasizes that effective governance, not just campaigning, plays a crucial role in election outcomes. He recently shared his insights on NewsNation, asserting that his predictions are based on a careful analysis of enduring political forces, rather than fleeting events. “I’ve always made my predictions before October and I never change them,” he stated, illustrating his commitment to a data-driven approach.
Renowned pollster Frank Luntz echoed Lichtman’s sentiments, noting that this year’s polling may not reflect the true state of the race. He acknowledged Lichtman’s impressive track record, calling him “brilliant” and a testament to historical success in election forecasting.
Lichtman’s system evaluates critical indicators like party strength, the incumbency advantage, and economic conditions. He identifies factors such as social unrest, policy changes, and even the charisma of candidates as essential in predicting election outcomes. As we look toward November, Lichtman suggests that while eight of the keys favor Vice President Kamala Harris, three do not. The final two keys—concerning foreign policy—remain in flux but are unlikely to decisively influence the election’s outcome.
For Republicans, understanding these dynamics can provide valuable context as we approach the election. It’s vital to stay informed and engaged, recognizing that governance and steadfast principles matter far more than the sensational headlines that often dominate political discourse. With careful analysis and strategic focus, the path forward can be clearer, helping to navigate the challenges that lie ahead.
while vote ID is important, voter ID will NOT ensure a secure vote. it is JUST ONE OF MANY steps that are needed for a secure vote. this is especially true now that there are various states granting IDs to illegals. when they do this, they are weakening whatever strength that voter ID used to have in the beginning.
what is more important, is having proper oversight at the polls to ensure that illegals are NOT voting AND to ensure that the ballot boxes are stuffed with illegitimate votes (for example, duplicate votes from the same “person”, votes from fictional characters, votes from dead people, etc…).