Was Biden 'Just A Puppet' Like Trump Says?

Trump’s Fired Federal Workers Get Jobs Back?

In a stunning turn of events, hundreds of federal employees who were previously let go are now back on the payroll—without having to work. Due to recent court rulings, agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Commerce have reinstated workers, but many are simply being placed on paid administrative leave while legal battles unfold.

A spokesperson for the EPA confirmed that 419 employees had their terminations rescinded in response to a court order. However, instead of returning to work, these employees are now in what the agency describes as “administrative leave status,” meaning they are still receiving paychecks without performing duties.

The Hill also obtained a notice from the Department of Commerce revealing that reinstated employees would remain in “paid, non-duty status” until further notice. The notice states that these employees will either stay on paid leave until the legal dispute is resolved or until the department makes a different determination—potentially leading to another round of terminations.

It remains unclear exactly how many employees across the federal government have received similar notices, but the number is expected to be significant. The situation stems from a sweeping policy that led to the termination of tens of thousands of workers, primarily those classified as “probationary” employees—individuals who were new to their roles or had recently been promoted.

Earlier reports indicated that hundreds of employees at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and roughly 400 at the EPA were among those dismissed. Yet, with the recent court order, many have been placed in this unusual “paid leave” limbo.

More Layoffs Expected as Federal Workforce Faces Overhaul

While some employees have been temporarily reinstated, this does not signal the end of staff reductions in Washington. According to reports, the federal government plans additional workforce cuts in the coming weeks. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is expected to see another 1,000 employees cut, while the National Park Service could face a 30% payroll reduction.

Despite the legal challenges, the push to trim government spending and reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies is expected to continue. However, for now, taxpayers are footing the bill for hundreds of employees to sit at home while awaiting the next court decision.

Neither the Commerce Department nor the White House has responded to requests for comment on these developments.

What do you think? Should federal employees be paid while on leave, or should agencies move forward with planned staff reductions?