Former President Joe Biden used a recent speech to sharply criticize President Donald Trump, accusing him of “brazen, blatant corruption” while pointing to projects such as putting Trump’s name on the Kennedy Center, plans for a large arch in Washington, D.C., and changes to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The remarks came during a speech that was largely focused on attacking Trump’s administration and its priorities.

BACKGROUND

During the speech, Biden argued that the projects reflected what he described as corruption on an unprecedented scale, while also criticizing what he called Trump’s vanity projects. After finishing his remarks, the 83-year-old Biden needed assistance finding his way off the stage. The appearance followed another widely discussed moment earlier in 2026 at a ceremony at Syracuse University, where Biden repeatedly said university board chairman Jeffrey M. Scruggs looked like former President Barack Obama and urged him several times to return to the podium. The exchange drew laughter from the audience, while Scruggs smiled, shook his head, and acknowledged the remarks with a shrug.

Trump’s SAVE Act Merged

House Republicans took a major step Monday in a battle that could shape both America’s national defense and the future of election integrity, advancing a key defense bill that now includes one of the GOP’s top legislative priorities.

The House Rules Committee approved the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in an 8-4 party-line vote, clearing the way for debate on the House floor. Republican leaders also adopted a procedural rule that combines the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act with the must-pass defense legislation through a process known as MIRVing.

The move represents Speaker Mike Johnson’s latest effort to unite House Republicans after several conservative lawmakers insisted they would not support procedural votes on major legislation until action was taken on the SAVE America Act.

The SAVE America Act has emerged as a central election reform proposal for Republicans. If enacted, the bill would order people registering to vote in federal elections to present documentation proving U.S. citizenship. Backers argue the measure would help protect election integrity, increase voter confidence, and ensure that only eligible citizens cast ballots. Opponents respond that federal law already makes it illegal for non-citizens to vote and warn that the new requirements could create additional obstacles for some eligible voters seeking to register.

While Monday’s committee vote marked an important victory for House Republican leaders, the toughest challenge may still lie ahead.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, one of the House’s strongest supporters of the SAVE America Act, warned that the Senate could simply remove the election integrity language from the defense bill before sending it back to the House. In posts on social media Monday, Luna expressed skepticism that attaching the SAVE America Act to the NDAA would ultimately guarantee its passage.

Her concerns highlight the difficult path facing Republican leadership as lawmakers attempt to move both national defense legislation and election security reforms through a narrowly divided Congress.

Speaker Johnson can afford very few Republican defections. With the GOP holding only a slim majority in the House, he is expected to need nearly every Republican vote to approve Tuesday’s procedural rule and advance the legislation.

Democrats strongly opposed the strategy during Monday’s Rules Committee hearing.

Rep. Jim McGovern, the committee’s ranking Democrat, introduced an amendment that would have removed the SAVE America Act language from the procedural rule. Republicans voted to defeat the amendment, allowing the election measure to remain attached to the defense package.

McGovern argued that Senate leaders have already indicated they could remove the SAVE America Act from the NDAA before final passage, making the House strategy ineffective. He also urged Republicans who want the defense bill enacted to reject what he described as a procedural maneuver that would not change the legislation’s ultimate outcome.

Republicans, however, believe attaching the SAVE America Act to must-pass legislation increases pressure on the Senate to address election security concerns instead of setting them aside. Many conservatives argue that requiring proof of citizenship is a commonsense safeguard that would strengthen confidence in federal elections while protecting the integrity of the voting process.

Beyond the NDAA, Tuesday’s procedural rule also packages several additional measures, including legislation to fund national security programs, the State Department, and other federal operations. Lawmakers will also consider a resolution recognizing the one-year anniversary of the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Tuesday’s vote is expected to serve as an important test of Republican unity as House leaders work to advance both defense priorities and election integrity legislation. Even if the House approves the combined package, the measure is widely expected to face significant hurdles in the Senate, where lawmakers will decide whether the SAVE America Act remains part of the final legislation.

With national security funding, election integrity, and Republican unity all on the line, this week’s debate could become one of the most closely watched legislative battles in Congress.