Canada Stunned By Trump

As Canada’s ambassador to the United States prepares to leave Washington after six turbulent years, she’s acknowledging what many Americans already see clearly: the U.S.–Canada economic relationship is no longer operating on autopilot.

Kirsten Hillman, Ottawa’s top envoy since 2020, is stepping down at a time when President Donald Trump’s America-First trade strategy has reshaped North American commerce, challenged longtime assumptions, and forced U.S. allies to rethink their economic dependence on the American market.

For many conservatives over 50 who remember earlier trade battles, this moment feels familiar — but also decisive.


From USMCA Success to Renewed Tariff Showdowns

Hillman played a key role in negotiating the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) during President Trump’s first term. The agreement replaced NAFTA and was widely promoted by the Trump administration as a victory for American manufacturing, farmers, and workers.

During those earlier negotiations, Hillman admitted discussions were intense and at times volatile. However, she emphasized that all sides agreed that structured North American trade strengthened American businesses and made U.S. companies more competitive globally.

After USMCA was implemented, U.S. exports to Canada reportedly surged — reinforcing arguments from Trump supporters that tougher negotiations produced measurable economic results.

But today’s environment looks very different.


45% Tariffs and a Reset of the U.S.–Canada Trade Relationship

Since returning to the White House, President Trump has escalated tariffs on Canadian goods — starting at 25 percent and later climbing to 45 percent.

The administration has framed these tariffs as necessary tools to:

  • Protect American manufacturing
  • Defend domestic industries
  • Reduce trade imbalances
  • Strengthen U.S. negotiating leverage

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney responded by declaring that the previous economic framework between the two countries was effectively “over.”

For American voters concerned about factory closures, energy independence, and border security, the renewed tariff strategy signals something different: Washington is no longer prioritizing predictability over leverage.


Trade Tensions Spill Into Infrastructure and Agriculture

The friction has extended beyond broad tariff policy.

President Trump has reportedly threatened to block the opening of a major cross-border bridge between Michigan and Ontario unless Canada addresses longstanding trade disputes — including high Canadian dairy tariffs and restrictions on U.S. alcohol exports.

Agricultural trade remains a key pressure point, especially for American dairy farmers who have long argued that Canada’s supply-management system disadvantages U.S. producers.

For readers in rural America, this is more than diplomacy — it’s about market access and generational livelihoods.


Defense Spending and F-35 Fighter Jets Under Review

Trade tensions are now influencing defense cooperation as well.

Canada is reassessing plans to purchase dozens of American-made F-35 fighter jets, a deal worth billions and closely tied to U.S. defense contractors and aerospace jobs.

Defense procurement decisions affect:

  • American manufacturing employment
  • National security partnerships
  • Long-term NATO strategy
  • U.S. military industrial investment

For conservative voters who prioritize military strength, these discussions carry major implications.


Is the U.S.–Canada Alliance Fracturing?

Despite public friction, Hillman insisted that working relationships between trade officials and diplomats remain intact. She described ongoing communication with members of President Trump’s team, even amid policy disagreements.

Still, she acknowledged what many observers recognize: in this administration, ultimate authority rests with President Trump.

That reality means leadership-to-leadership relationships matter more than ever.


USMCA Review: A Critical Turning Point

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement is up for formal review this year — a moment that could redefine North American trade for another generation.

Supporters of the administration argue the review provides an opportunity to:

  • Strengthen enforcement mechanisms
  • Protect U.S. manufacturing supply chains
  • Secure agricultural concessions
  • Address trade loopholes

Critics, particularly in Canada, worry about long-term predictability.

But from a conservative economic perspective, predictability is less important than fairness and national interest.


Business Leaders Brace for Continued Volatility

Canadian business leaders are reportedly preparing for continued uncertainty. Many are reconsidering heavy reliance on the U.S. market after years of assuming stable access.

For American negotiators, that shift may actually represent leverage.

Diversification efforts by Canada could take years — and the United States remains its largest and most critical trading partner by far.


Ambassador’s Advice: Understand America Beyond Washington

As she exits her post, Hillman offered one final piece of advice to her successor: get out of Washington.

She noted that understanding America requires visiting states like Texas, West Virginia, Michigan, and others — places where energy, manufacturing, and agriculture shape political priorities far more than Beltway diplomacy.

For many Americans over 50, this rings true. Real economic concerns live outside D.C.


A Relationship in Strategic Transition

The U.S.–Canada alliance is not collapsing — but it is evolving.

President Trump’s tariff strategy has forced difficult conversations about trade fairness, economic sovereignty, defense spending, and global leverage.

As USMCA review talks approach and tariff negotiations continue, one reality is clear:

North American trade is no longer operating on habit. It is being renegotiated with American workers at the center of the conversation.

For conservative voters focused on jobs, industry, and national strength, that may be exactly the point.