Is Trump Making America Great Again Like He Promised?

Trump Deletes List Of What?

On Tuesday, the Trump administration unveiled a list of more than 440 federal properties identified for potential closure or sale, with the goal of reducing government waste and saving taxpayer dollars. Among the prominent properties included were the FBI’s headquarters, the J. Edgar Hoover Building, and the Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building. These locations, along with others such as the Old Post Office Building in Washington, D.C. (previously home to Trump’s hotel), were deemed “non-core” to government operations.

However, just hours after the initial announcement, the administration released a revised list that contained only 320 properties, notably excluding any from the nation’s capital. By Wednesday morning, the list had been removed entirely from the General Services Administration (GSA) website with a cryptic message reading “Non-core property list (Coming soon).” The GSA, which was responsible for the list, has yet to comment on the changes.

The initial list was extensive, spanning the country and including major properties like the Major General Emmett J. Bean Federal Center in Indiana and the Speaker Nancy Pelosi Federal Building in San Francisco. The properties included courthouses, office buildings, and even parking garages, and they were spread across nearly every state. With roughly 80% of federal employees located outside of Washington, D.C., the administration’s effort reflects a broader push to consolidate federal operations and reduce redundant or unused space.

The Trump administration emphasized that selling these buildings would eliminate the wasteful use of taxpayer dollars spent on vacant or underused federal property. The proceeds could be reinvested into better work environments for agencies still in operation. Additionally, Trump’s collaboration with figures like Elon Musk has fueled efforts to slash federal spending and streamline the government workforce, a move that aims to improve efficiency and cut costs.

In addition to economic considerations, the administration has long criticized the architecture of certain federal buildings, especially those in the brutalist style, which has been an eyesore for many conservatives. This is evident in the list, which targeted buildings housing agencies such as the FBI and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), two institutions frequently criticized by Trump for overreach.

This initiative is also part of a broader strategy by the administration to cut back on federal office space. Last month, regional managers from the GSA were instructed to begin terminating leases for approximately 7,500 federal offices across the country, with the goal of axing up to 300 leases per day. While these changes may raise concerns about the future of government services, the administration maintains that reducing office space will result in significant savings for taxpayers, potentially exceeding $430 million annually.

As this process continues, questions remain about what will happen to services currently provided from these buildings. However, the administration’s commitment to reducing waste, cutting unnecessary government spending, and reshaping how federal agencies operate aligns with its broader goals of improving efficiency and making the government more accountable to the American people. This is a step toward returning government functions to the hands of the people and ensuring that taxpayers’ hard-earned dollars are being used effectively.