DOJ Ordered To Crack Down On De Niro
Conservative commentator Bill O’Reilly is urging the Department of Justice (DOJ) to examine recent statements made by actor Robert De Niro about President Donald Trump — comments O’Reilly says raise serious concerns in today’s volatile political climate.
The controversy stems from an interview De Niro gave to MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace on her podcast, where the longtime Trump critic said Americans must “make him leave” and repeated that “we’ve got to get rid of him.”
Those words immediately sparked backlash among supporters of President Trump, particularly given the heightened sensitivity surrounding presidential security and political rhetoric.
What Did Robert De Niro Say About President Trump?
During the interview, De Niro expressed deep frustration with President Trump, claiming he fears Trump “will never leave” office unless Americans take action.
“We have to make him leave,” the actor said, doubling down with the phrase, “we’ve got to get rid of him.”
While some interpret the comments as passionate political speech, others — including Bill O’Reilly — believe the phrasing crosses into dangerous territory.
Bill O’Reilly Responds: “What Do You Mean by That?”
On his program No Spin News, O’Reilly questioned what exactly De Niro meant by “get rid of him.”
“He was elected,” O’Reilly reminded viewers, noting the more than 77 million Americans who voted for President Trump. “Are you talking about impeachment? The next election? What exactly are you saying?”
O’Reilly argued that in an era of intense political division, public figures must choose their words carefully — especially when discussing the President of the United States.
Federal Law and Presidential Protection
During his show, O’Reilly referenced federal law that makes knowingly and willfully issuing threats against the President or Vice President a serious criminal offense.
He pointed out that presidential security is not a theoretical concern. Given the history of threats and past attempts against President Trump, O’Reilly argued that even ambiguous language should be evaluated carefully.
“I’d make an example of this guy,” O’Reilly said, emphasizing that his position is not about revenge or politics but about enforcing the same standard for everyone.
He added that the Secret Service should determine whether the comments warrant further review.
Robert De Niro’s Long History of Trump Criticism
Robert De Niro has been one of President Trump’s most outspoken Hollywood critics for years. He has frequently accused Trump of undermining democratic norms and has appeared at multiple progressive political events.
In the same interview, De Niro encouraged Americans to engage in activism ahead of the upcoming midterm elections and discussed organizing at polling locations.
He also headlined a rebuttal-style event following President Trump’s recent State of the Union address, where he said he felt “betrayed” by the country’s direction and called for a return to what he described as foundational American values.
The Bigger Question: Where Is the Line in Political Speech?
The clash between Bill O’Reilly and Robert De Niro highlights a larger national debate about political rhetoric in America.
Supporters of President Trump argue that phrases like “get rid of him” are reckless and inflammatory — particularly in a tense political environment.
Others defend the comments as constitutionally protected political speech.
For millions of Americans — especially older voters who value stability, rule of law, and constitutional order — the issue is less about Hollywood drama and more about standards.
Should public figures face consequences for language that could be interpreted as threatening?
Or is this simply another example of heated political disagreement?
As the 2026 midterm elections approach, scrutiny over political rhetoric is likely to intensify.
One thing is clear: in today’s America, words carry weight — especially when directed at the President of the United States.
