Trump hands Newsom another reason to cry.
LOS ANGELES, CA — In a sweeping and unanimous ruling Thursday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals delivered a major legal victory to President Donald J. Trump, upholding his authority to deploy and command National Guard troops in Los Angeles—overriding objections from California Governor Gavin Newsom.
This high-profile decision blocks a lower court’s attempt to strip the president of command and return control to Gov. Newsom, who has faced sharp criticism for his handling of crime, homelessness, and law enforcement in California.
✅ BREAKING: Ninth Circuit rules Trump acted lawfully — even without Newsom’s approval.
It marks the first time since 1965 that a U.S. president has deployed the National Guard in a state without the governor’s consent. Legal experts say the ruling could set a powerful precedent in future cases of civil unrest or political gridlock.
Court Sides with Trump: President Has Authority Under Federal Law
The judges cited 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3) — a rarely invoked federal statute — which authorizes the president to federalize the National Guard when local resources are insufficient to enforce national law.
“Giving appropriate deference to the President, we find it likely that he acted within the scope of his legal authority,” the court stated.
Importantly, the court rejected Gov. Newsom’s claim that the federalization of the Guard was immune from judicial review—striking a blow to arguments that sought to limit presidential authority during national crises.
Trump Celebrates: “This Is a Great Decision for Our Country”
Taking to Truth Social late Thursday night, President Trump praised the Ninth Circuit’s ruling as a turning point for federal leadership and public safety.
“Huge victory in the Ninth Circuit for the President’s fundamental right to deploy the National Guard! The judges clearly saw that Gavin Newsom is unfit and unprepared. We will keep standing up for law-abiding citizens and ensuring their safety.”
Trump emphasized that the decision wasn’t just about California, but about the right of the federal government to protect cities across the country when local leadership fails.
Why This Matters: A Warning Shot to Failing Democrat Leadership
This case highlights a growing divide between strong federal leadership and the soft-on-crime policies seen in left-wing states. As violent crime, looting, and civil unrest continue to plague urban areas under Democrat control, many Americans are demanding stronger action.
Though the president did not notify Gov. Newsom in advance—as typically required—the court confirmed that the governor had no legal power to veto the deployment.
✅ Key Takeaways for Patriotic Americans:
- Trump’s legal authority as Commander-in-Chief was upheld.
- States like California cannot block the federal government from restoring order.
- This ruling may empower future Republican presidents to act decisively in times of crisis.
- Democrat-run cities continue to resist federal help—even as crime spirals out of control.
📰 Don’t Miss Out – Stay Informed
If you’re concerned about rising crime, weak governors, or out-of-control cities, subscribe for the latest news on President Trump’s efforts to restore law and order nationwide.
