This is complete nonsense.
In a high-stakes ruling with nationwide impact, a federal judge on Wednesday halted President Donald Trump’s attempt to deploy National Guard forces to Los Angeles — a move that instantly shifted authority back to California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The decision delivers a major victory to Democrat-led states that have been pushing back for months against Trump’s efforts to rein in growing immigration-related unrest.
Judge Blocks Trump’s National Guard Deployment
The ruling, handed down by U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, strikes at the heart of the Trump administration’s argument that continued federalization of the Guard was necessary to protect federal property, curb rising crime, and reinforce overwhelmed law enforcement in Los Angeles.
Breyer rejected that position outright, insisting the unrest did not constitute the “rebellion” required under federal law for a president to seize control of state National Guard units. The judge claimed Trump’s interpretation could lead to a dangerous precedent — one that might “create a national police force made up of state troops.”
A Direct Challenge to Trump’s Executive Authority
Breyer’s 35-page ruling repeatedly emphasized concerns about federal overreach and declared the deployment “contrary to law.”
He warned that the founders intended checks and balances — not unchecked executive power.
“Our system depends on boundaries,” Breyer wrote. “Defendants appear to want a blank check.”
White House Fires Back, Vows to Fight
The Trump administration responded immediately, making clear this battle is far from over. White House officials told Fox News Digital they expect “ultimate victory” once the case advances to higher courts.
“President Trump exercised lawful authority to deploy National Guard troops after violent riots that local leaders — including ‘Newscum’ — refused to stop,” spokesperson Abigail Jackson said. “We look forward to prevailing on the merits.”
Months of Conflict Between Trump and Blue-State Governors
This ruling is the latest twist in a months-long struggle over Trump’s effort to federalize Guard units in states that resisted crackdowns on disruptive immigration protests.
Earlier in the year, Trump succeeded in deploying roughly 5,000 personnel — including 4,000 California National Guard troops and nearly 700 U.S. Marines — after the 9th Circuit temporarily lifted an injunction. Yet according to Breyer, the federal government still retains control of around 300 Guard members despite a lack of evidence that federal law enforcement operations are being obstructed.
Newsom Celebrates, But The Fight Isn’t Over
Newsom, who sued immediately after Trump’s initial move, has repeatedly framed the deployment as unconstitutional and dangerous. Democratic governors in Oregon, Illinois, and other states have echoed those concerns as Trump sought to strengthen federal authority amid nationwide unrest.
Breyer stayed his new injunction until December 15, giving the Trump administration time to appeal — and ensuring the political and legal fight will continue into the winter.
A High-Stakes Clash Over Federal Power and States’ Rights
Trump officials argue the deployments are essential to combat crime spikes, protect federal assets, and respond to increasingly aggressive anti-ICE demonstrations. Critics, however, see the move as federal overreach that could reshape the balance of power between Washington and the states.
For now, Newsom has secured a major victory. But with an appeal looming, the final outcome of this constitutional showdown may still rest with higher courts — and the stakes for national security, public safety, and executive authority remain enormous.
