Here’s what happened.
In a stunning development, a group of anonymous federal judges is attacking the Supreme Court after it repeatedly sided with President Donald Trump’s administration, reversing lower court rulings that attempted to block parts of his America First agenda.
According to a report by NBC News, these judges — appointed by both Democrat and Republican presidents — are outraged that the Supreme Court has been overturning their decisions through emergency rulings, often without lengthy explanations.
This growing conflict reveals a deep power struggle inside America’s legal system, as activist judges continue to clash with President Trump and his historic efforts to restore law, order, and sovereignty.
Judges Furious Over Trump’s Legal Victories
NBC interviewed 12 federal judges who admitted frustration over the Supreme Court’s actions. Ten of the judges went so far as to accuse the Court of undermining their authority, saying its decisions made them appear incompetent to the public.
“It is inexcusable,” one judge angrily said. “They don’t have our backs.”
The same judge revealed they have even received death threats after issuing rulings that countered President Trump’s policies — a dramatic sign of just how high tensions have become.
Trump Fires Back at Judicial Activism
President Trump has never been shy about calling out activist judges who try to block his policies.
When Judge James Boasberg attempted to halt deportation flights to El Salvador, Trump responded on social media, saying the judge should be “IMPEACHED.”
In March, when several judges tried to block Trump’s tariff agenda, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller described their actions as nothing less than a “judicial coup.”
One anonymous judge even issued a chilling warning, predicting that if criticism from Trump and his top officials continues, “somebody is going to die.”
Another complained that lower courts were being “thrown under the bus” by the Supreme Court, while a third suggested the Court itself was participating in a kind of “judicial coup.”
Obama-Appointed Judge Admits ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’
Not all judges agreed with the anti-Trump faction. One judge, appointed by former President Barack Obama, admitted that some colleagues have let their personal hatred of Trump cloud their legal judgment.
“The whole ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ is a real issue,” the judge confessed. “Judges are mad at what Trump is doing — or how he’s doing it — and they sometimes forget to stay in their lane.”
This candid statement highlights a growing problem within the judiciary: political bias seeping into the courtroom, threatening the rule of law.
The Bigger Picture: Trump vs. The Deep State Judiciary
This fierce battle between President Trump and the lower courts isn’t just about individual cases — it’s about the future of America’s legal system.
For decades, unelected judges have used their positions to push liberal policies and block conservative reforms. Now, with Trump reshaping the Supreme Court and pushing back against judicial overreach, these activist judges are lashing out like never before.
The Supreme Court’s recent actions suggest that Trump’s efforts are succeeding — and that the Deep State judiciary is feeling the pressure.
Where Do You Stand?
Do you believe activist judges are trying to sabotage President Trump and his fight to put America First? Or are these judges simply doing their jobs?
