A former senior FBI leader is entering the political arena — and he’s placing President Donald Trump at the center of his campaign message.
Dave Sundberg, who previously served as Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Washington Field Office, has announced his candidacy for Congress in Maryland. In launching his campaign, Sundberg claims he was removed from his post in early 2025 during what he describes as a politically motivated leadership shakeup within the federal government.
His decision to run is already drawing attention from both Democrats and Republicans.
Former FBI Leader Says He Was Removed After Dispute With Administration
In a public statement posted online, Sundberg said he was dismissed in January 2025. He characterized his removal as part of a broader restructuring effort under the Trump administration.
Sundberg alleges that he was unwilling to carry out what he viewed as politically driven directives. While he did not provide specific operational details, he framed his departure as a matter of principle.
In his announcement, he wrote that although he lost his position, his commitment to the Constitution remains unchanged.
The Trump administration has not publicly responded to the specific claims made in Sundberg’s campaign announcement.
Claims of Justice Department “Weaponization”
A major theme of Sundberg’s campaign centers on concerns about the Department of Justice.
In campaign materials, he argues that federal institutions have been used in ways he believes blur the line between law enforcement and politics. He also criticized what he described as expanded executive authority during President Trump’s current term.
Supporters of the administration, however, have consistently argued that leadership changes within federal agencies are well within presidential authority and necessary to ensure policy alignment.
This disagreement reflects a broader national debate over the proper role of executive power and federal law enforcement — an issue that continues to resonate with voters across the political spectrum.
Maryland’s 5th District: An Open Seat After Steny Hoyer’s Departure
Sundberg is seeking the Democratic nomination in Maryland’s 5th Congressional District. The seat became open after longtime Democratic Congressman Steny Hoyer announced he will not run for reelection.
The district has historically leaned Democratic, making the primary election especially significant.
Sundberg’s background in federal law enforcement may appeal to some voters who prioritize public safety and government accountability. However, he will likely face competition from other Democratic candidates with established political networks in the district.
Republican Response: Focus on Economic Issues
Republican officials quickly responded to Sundberg’s announcement.
Emma Hall, spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, stated that campaigns centered primarily on attacking President Trump do not address what many Americans view as pressing concerns — including inflation, energy prices, border security, and retirement stability.
Hall argued that voters are looking for practical solutions that lower costs and protect working families.
With economic concerns remaining top-of-mind for many Americans over age 50, messaging around financial security, Social Security protection, and healthcare affordability may play a significant role in shaping the race.
Broader Implications for 2026 Elections
Sundberg’s campaign reflects a growing trend of former federal officials entering electoral politics. Across the country, debates over executive authority, federal agency independence, and political accountability are becoming central campaign themes.
For conservative voters, questions about bureaucratic overreach and institutional bias remain highly relevant. For others, concerns about checks and balances continue to shape voting decisions.
As the 2026 midterm elections approach, Maryland’s 5th District will offer one example of how those national debates translate into local races.
Voters will ultimately decide whether Sundberg’s message gains traction — or whether economic and kitchen-table issues dominate the conversation.
