Judge Tosses Republican Lawsuit
A federal judge has officially threw out a lawsuit against Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), delivering a major victory for free speech, congressional immunity, and the rule of law.
The lawsuit was filed by Brian Musgrave, one of several men Mace called out as a “predator” during a fiery speech on the House floor. Musgrave claimed her words were false and ruined his reputation — but the court ruled that federal law shields lawmakers acting within their official duties.
Obama-Appointed Judge Rules Against Lawsuit
U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel, appointed by former President Barack Obama, admitted that Musgrave may have little legal recourse even if Mace’s accusations damaged his reputation. Still, the law is clear: elected officials cannot be sued for defamation when performing their duties in Congress.
Judge Gergel explained that Congress has already considered the trade-offs and determined that defamation and similar claims against federal officials, when carried out as part of their official duties, are prohibited under federal law.
This ruling highlights the power of the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause, which was designed by America’s Founders to protect lawmakers from political intimidation.
Nancy Mace Celebrates: “The Constitution Is the Law of the Land”
Rep. Mace — who just launched her campaign for Governor of South Carolina — celebrated the decision as proof that the Constitution still protects truth-tellers.
“Today the court proved the U.S. Constitution is the LAW OF THE LAND,” Mace said. “They came after me because I stood up for victims and demanded crime be prosecuted. Their lies and attacks won’t break me. I’ll never stop fighting for law and order.”
Her strong stance resonates with conservative voters frustrated with weak prosecutions and the soft-on-crime policies pushed by Democrats nationwide.
The Case: Hidden Cameras, Accusations, and Political Fallout
Musgrave sued in March after Mace alleged that a hidden camera found on a property he co-owned was used to secretly record women. He denied any involvement, but Mace labeled him a “predator” alongside her ex-fiancé and two others.
The lawsuit challenged not only Mace’s speech but also her online statements and a poster displayed outside her congressional office labeled “PREDATORS.” Later, the Justice Department stepped in, confirming that Mace’s actions fell within her official duties — a determination that granted her legal immunity.
Even Musgrave’s attorney admitted the decision leaves ordinary citizens defenseless against lawmakers. “It seems patently unfair … that someone can be called a predator without proof and have no recourse,” Eric Bland said.
Political Implications for South Carolina
The ruling could energize Mace’s gubernatorial bid as she positions herself as a tough-on-crime, pro-Constitution candidate. She has already clashed with state officials, including Attorney General Alan Wilson (R), accusing him of failing to investigate her claims thoroughly.
Her willingness to take personal and political risks to call out alleged predators has become a central theme of her campaign, winning her support among voters who value accountability and courage.
Bottom Line
With this ruling, Nancy Mace has secured more than just a legal victory — she has established herself as a fighter for victims, a defender of the Constitution, and a bold conservative voice heading into South Carolina’s governor’s race.
