Here’s what happened.

Former CIA Director John Brennan has filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration, asking a court to order government officials to preserve records connected to ongoing investigations involving him.

According to the lawsuit, Brennan believes those documents could become essential if federal prosecutors eventually decide to pursue criminal charges. His legal team argues that preserving the records now would ensure they remain available should he need to challenge any future prosecution.

Brennan’s attorneys claim the records could help determine whether Justice Department officials acted for legitimate law enforcement reasons or whether political considerations played a role. They argue that a federal judge would need access to internal communications and investigative materials to fully evaluate those questions if a criminal case is ever brought.

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Washington and names President Donald Trump along with several senior administration officials as defendants. Those named include Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, FBI Director Kash Patel, and federal prosecutors in the state of Florida that have been involved in investigations concerning Brennan and other former government officials.

The filing does not challenge any criminal charges, as none have been filed against Brennan. Instead, it seeks to preserve evidence that his attorneys say could become important if legal proceedings move forward in the future.

The lawsuit comes as the Trump administration continues to face legal battles while pursuing investigations involving former intelligence and national security officials. At the same time, supporters of the administration argue that federal law enforcement should thoroughly examine allegations of misconduct wherever the evidence leads, while critics contend the investigations risk becoming politically motivated.

The case now heads to federal court, where a judge will determine whether the administration must preserve the requested records as the legal dispute unfolds.